caddus
07-19-2009, 05:32 PM
I, like most other readers of blunt magazine, have articals that I love, purely because they are about my favorite bands. As much as i am interested in the content, I feel all warm and fuzzy knowing a little bit more about my bands than i did before reading.
And yes, there are articals I skip because I may not like that band all too much, but I do realise there are 1000's of other readers who love the band, and are going to do the same as what i am doing right now, and read away...
getting to the point...
WHY ARE BLUNT WRITING ABOUT 3OH!3?
Please tell me I am not the only reader who doesnt understand the logic behind this bands inclusion in Blunt magazine. shouldnt they be on the cover of some pre-teen princess magazine next too the pussycat dolls or some shit?
FUCK 3OH!3 AND FUCK ANYONE WHO BOUGHT BLUNT MAGAZINE BECAUSE THEY WERE IN IT.
No disrespect to the creators of Blunt. I hope the only reason you included them was because you were forced too.
anyone else with me on this one?
And yes, there are articals I skip because I may not like that band all too much, but I do realise there are 1000's of other readers who love the band, and are going to do the same as what i am doing right now, and read away...
getting to the point...
WHY ARE BLUNT WRITING ABOUT 3OH!3?
Please tell me I am not the only reader who doesnt understand the logic behind this bands inclusion in Blunt magazine. shouldnt they be on the cover of some pre-teen princess magazine next too the pussycat dolls or some shit?
FUCK 3OH!3 AND FUCK ANYONE WHO BOUGHT BLUNT MAGAZINE BECAUSE THEY WERE IN IT.
No disrespect to the creators of Blunt. I hope the only reason you included them was because you were forced too.
anyone else with me on this one?